Upozornenie: Prezeranie týchto stránok je určené len pre návštevníkov nad 18 rokov!
Zásady ochrany osobných údajov.
Používaním tohto webu súhlasíte s uchovávaním cookies, ktoré slúžia na poskytovanie služieb, nastavenie reklám a analýzu návštevnosti. OK, súhlasím









A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | CH | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9

Proposed 2019 amendment to the Constitution of Malaysia

Constitution (Amendment) Bill 2019
Parliament of Malaysia
  • A Bill intituled an Act to amend the Federal Constitution.
Territorial extentMalaysia
Considered byDewan Rakyat
Legislative history
Bill citationD.R 7/2019
Introduced byLiew Vui Keong
First reading4 April 2019
Second reading9 April 2019 (negatived)
Amends
Constitution of Malaysia
Related legislation
Constitution (Amendment) Act 1976
Summary
To restore the constitutional status of Sabah and Sarawak according to the Malaysia Agreement.
Status: Not passed

On 4 April 2019, a bill proposing an amendment to the Constitution of Malaysia was tabled in the Dewan Rakyat of the Parliament of Malaysia. The bill proposes to amend Article 1(2) so as to restore the status of the two East Malaysian states of Sabah and Sarawak according to the original content of Malaysia Agreement that was signed in 1963.[1][2][3]

Despite six hours of debate in the Parliament during the second reading of the bill on 9 April,[4][5] only 138 MPs supported the bill, 10 votes short of the two-thirds majority of the chamber, 148 votes, required for amendments to the Constitution. The remaining 59 (non-absent) votes were abstentions, all of which are from opposition parties.[6][7][8][9]

Background

1976 constitutional amendment

In 1976, under the premiership of then-Prime Minister Hussein Onn, Article 1(2) was amended as part of a larger package affecting 45 articles and 2 schedules in the Constitution of Malaysia. This package removed the distinction between the states in Peninsular Malaysia and the Bornean states of Sabah and Sarawak. It was argued, at the time, that the change would lead to greater uniformity between the eastern and western regions of Malaysia. As a result of some political maneuvering by the then Prime Minister, no MPs from Sabah or Sarawak opposed this amendment package.[10]

Breaches of the Malaysia Agreement

A "Sarawak for Sarawakians" car sticker incorporating elements of a pre-Malaysian Sarawak flag.

The 1963 Malaysia Agreement, under which Sabah and Sarawak unified with Malaya to become Malaysia, included strong provisions for the autonomy of Sabah and Sarawak (see the 18-point and 20-point agreement). However, this autonomy has eroded in numerous aspects, such as a smaller share of oil revenue than previously agreed and a reduction in the territorial waters that belonged to each state. Following their victory in the 2018 election, the Pakatan Harapan alliance promised to make changes including an amendment to Article 1(2) and a greater share of oil revenue.[2][3][11][12][13] Other causes of dispute between East and West Malaysia include freedom of religion,[14] distribution of profits from natural resources,[15][16] and demographic change (particularly in Sabah).[17][18][19][20]

Prior to 2010, the anniversary of Federation was a public holiday in only the East Malaysian states, but it was later made a national holiday by the government in response to an opposition statement declaring their intention to do so if they won an election.[21] Some groups, including the Borneo Heritage Foundation (BHF), Movement for Change Sarawak (MoCS), and the Sarawak Association of People's Aspirations (SAPA), have cited these issues, among others, as reasons for advocating separation from Malaysia.[14][22][23]

1963 Malaysia Agreement (MA63)
Authority of
 Sabah
 Sarawak
MA63 as agreed between
 United Kingdom,  Malaya, North Borneo, Sarawak, Singapore
Current situation under
 Malaysia
Development British delegation promised both states a total of £1½ million a year for five years after Malaysia Day, provided the Malayan government also extended aid for that period.[24] Malaya would provide $200 million to North Borneo and $300 million to Sarawak for the first five years of Malaysia,[25] while Singapore would provide a $150 million development loan to North Borneo and Sarawak, of which $100 million would be interest-free for five years[26][27] Sabah: RM5 billion per year[28][29]
Sarawak: RM4.3 billion per year[29]
[30][31][32][33]
Education Rights to own education system[note 1] Malaysia standardised education system
(Dilapidated schools and frequent misinformation in history textbooks for both Sabah and Sarawak history)[34][35][36]
Immigration Control immigration entry[note 2] Controlled immigration entry via permit[37][38]
(Sabah: Southern Filipino refugees fleeing the civil war were issued IMM13 documents by the Federal government, instead of the Sabahan state government, leading to a situation whereby the refugees, and their families who had settled in Sabah, could not be stripped of their IMM13 without rendering them stateless as the Philippine government did not recognise them as citizens)[39][40]
Language English as the official language[note 3] Sabah: Malay is amended as official language through the controversial 1973 State Constitution[41][42]
Sarawak: Both Malay and English are official language as of 2015[43]
(Malay is also used in all courts except High Court and Native Court)
Law Authority to agree/disagree to amend law[note 4] Recognised as state under Malaysian laws with the exclusion of certain laws (e.g. National Land Code)
(Frequent reported conflicts with federal government regarding indigenous land rights)[44][45]
Natural resources North Borneo: 40% of the state revenue[46]
Sarawak: Up to RM21 million for the first four years
(Both North Borneo and Sarawak retain import duty, excise duty and export duty with North Borneo retain a total of 30% from customs and excise for as long it is responsible for health and medical expenditure)[note 5]
In 1966, the Continental Shelf Act was enforced by the federal government on the two despite both had already extended their jurisdiction over the continental shelf adjacent to their territory.[47] Further in 1974, the Petroleum Development Act was enforced on the two, giving them only 5% of oil royalty from the revenue[48][49][50]
Religion No official religion[note 6] Sabah: Islam is amended as official religion through the controversial 1973 State Constitution[41][42][51]
Sarawak: No official religion (Updated in state government website as of 2015.[52] In 2018, Sarawak began to allow converts to renounce Islam if they already wish so without the need to keep forcing them to stay in the religion)[53]
(Frequent cases of Sabahan and Sarawakians non-Muslims identified as Muslims,[54][55] Muslims who wish to convert out of Islam are being prevented as well the rampant religious intolerance and conversion of non-Muslims students in schools without their parents consent.[56] In July 2006, state mufti of Sabah issued a fatwa to an ongoing Taoist statue project where a stop-work order was then being imposed by the state government on the construction of Mazu (Goddess of the Sea) statue in Kudat District.[57][58] Further in April 2007, a local businesswoman loan application was rejected because her unisex styling business was in conflict with Islam)[58]
See also: 1962 Inter-Governmental Committee (IGC) Report and 1963 Malaysia Agreement

Inter-governmental negotiations

In October 2009, the then Prime Minister Najib Razak declared that Malaysia Day would become a national holiday with the intent of promoting unity between West and East Malaysia.[21][59] On the Malaysia Day following his victory in the 2018 general election, Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad announced a commitment to restore Sabah and Sarawak as equal partners to Western Peninsula after a review of the 1963 Malaysia Agreement.[60][61] That year, the Prime Minister's Department published a special article regarding the formation of the country.[62]

On 5 March 2019, a meeting was held between Prime Minister Mahathir and representatives from the Sabah and Sarawak governments. Neither party identified any significant items of dispute with regards to the 1963 agreement. Items that were not resolved, such as stamp duty were to be referred to a Technical Review for detailed assessment.[63] Although some issues were unresolved, Minister of Law in the Prime Minister's Department Liew Vui Keong announced on 8 March that the cabinet had agreed to amend Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution and that the amendment will be tabled for the next sitting of Parliament on 11 March.[64] On 11 March, the sitting of Parliament began with the amendment being the primary focus of discussion.[65]

On 2 April, Minister Liew announced that the federal government would table the amendment at the Parliamentary meeting, scheduled for the following week.[66]

Dewan Rakyat debate

First reading

Bill for the Amendment of the Article (1) 2 of the Constitution of Malaysia, p 1
Bill for the Amendment of the Article (1) 2 of the Constitution of Malaysia, p 2
(Left) A copy of the bill on the proposed amendment as retrieved on 4 April 2019. Article 1 (2) as it stands now, reads: "The States of the Federation shall be Johore, Kedah, Kelantan, Malacca, Negeri Sembilan, Pahang, Penang, Perak, Perlis, Sabah, Sarawak, Selangor and Terengganu".[67]
(Right) The bill explanatory statement.[67][68]

On 4 April, before the amendment could be tabled for its first reading by Minister Liew, a number of opposition MPs from Sabah and Sarawak raised significant concerns that the proposed amendment was being pushed through without adequate consultation with East Malaysian MPs on the draft contents.[67] Minister Liew responded with a statement in Parliament that the amendment would effectively change the status of Sabah and Sarawak from state into territory, once the committee completed their review of the 1963 agreement.[69]

In his statement, Liew also explained that the special committee was chaired by Prime Minister Mahathir, along with the Chief Ministers of Sabah and Sarawak, the Attorney Generals and other high-ranking officers. However, he did not clarify why the bill should be passed before other separate amendments, which would promote greater autonomy of the two entities, were implemented.[69] Despite the review and meetings, the bill was opposed after the reading,[70] with one opposition MP, Sim Kui Hian of the Sarawak United Peoples' Party (SUPP) who voted against the bill, stating in an interview that the amendment retained Sarawak as one of the 13 states of Malaysia rather than equal partner. He also stated that there was no amendment to Article 160 of the constitution regarding the definition of "Federation", which should be based on the Malaysia Agreement of 1963 instead of the Malaya Agreement of 1957.[71] Other opposition MPs also followed suit demanding the bill be temporary retracted.[72]

Second reading

The bill redefinition as announced by Minister in the Prime Minister's Department for Legal Affairs, Liew Vui Keong on 8 April 2019 for the amendment as according to the original 1963 agreement with the exclusion of Singapore which have leaving the federation in 1965.[73]

On 8 April, Minister Liew stated that the wording of the bill would follow the 1963 version of Article 1(2) of the Constitution. The minister also stated that he received no opposition from the Prime Minister or the federal Attorney General.[73][74] However, despite these changes,[75] Fadillah Yusof, Chief Whip of the Sarawak Parties Coalition (GPS), stood firm on a request that the bill be temporarily withdrawn, or referred to a select committee, for further discussion.[76]

In a speech on 9 April, during the second reading of the bill, Prime Minister Mahathir stated that the amendment was a "starting point and is an appropriate time for the Pakatan Harapan (PH) government to take the first step in realising the needs of the people in Sabah and Sarawak in line with the Malaysia Agreement 1963".[77] People's Justice Party (PKR) President Anwar Ibrahim concurred saying the matter had undergone extensive debate and that the concerns of the people of Sabah and Sarawak were being addressed by the PH administration. He also stated that restoration of the two states was a meaningful step being undertaken by the PH government, compared to the half century of inaction by the previous Barisan Nasional government, and should not be opposed.[4][78]

In response to a question from Ketereh MP Tan Sri Annuar Musa concerning the necessity of having a select committee review the bill, Sabah Chief Minister Shafie Apdal agreed that such a review was unnecessary and would only delay other amendments that would restore other aspects of the 1963 agreement. He also refuted claims that passing of the bill would result in an "erosion of nationhood among the people of Sabah and Sarawak".[79]

Division result

At 10:20 pm local time, the chamber divided.[80] Of the 197 MPs present, 138 voted in support for the amendment while 59, primarily members of the Barisan Nasional coalition, did not cast a vote.[5][6] The bill was put up for voting by Speaker Mohamad Ariff Md Yusof after a day-long debate with no MPs from either side actually opposing the restoration bill.[4][9]

Votes by each MP mapped onto their respective constituencies.
Zdroj:https://en.wikipedia.org?pojem=Proposed_2019_amendment_to_the_Constitution_of_Malaysia
>Text je dostupný pod licencí Creative Commons Uveďte autora – Zachovejte licenci, případně za dalších podmínek. Podrobnosti naleznete na stránce Podmínky užití.
Zdroj: Wikipedia.org - čítajte viac o Proposed 2019 amendment to the Constitution of Malaysia





Text je dostupný za podmienok Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 Unported; prípadne za ďalších podmienok.
Podrobnejšie informácie nájdete na stránke Podmienky použitia.


Constitution (Amendment) Bill 2019: second reading division result
No. Name Party (coalition) Constituency State
Supported (138)[81]
1 Abdul Latiff Ahmad Malaysian United Indigenous Party (Pakatan Harapan) Mersing  Johor
2 Abdul Rahim Bakri Malaysian United Indigenous Party (Pakatan Harapan) Kudat  Sabah
3 Abdullah Sani Abdul Hamid People's Justice Party (Pakatan Harapan) Kapar  Selangor
4 Ahmad Faizal Azumu Malaysian United Indigenous Party (Pakatan Harapan) Tambun  Perak
5 Ahmad Hassan Sabah Heritage Party Papar  Sabah
6 Akmal Nasrullah Nasir People's Justice Party (Pakatan Harapan) Johor Bahru  Johor
7 Ali Biju People's Justice Party (Pakatan Harapan) Saratok  Sarawak
8 Alice Lau Kiong Yieng Democratic Action Party (Pakatan Harapan) Lanang  Sarawak
9 Amiruddin Hamzah Malaysian United Indigenous Party (Pakatan Harapan) Kubang Pasu  Kedah
10 Anifah Aman Independent Kimanis  Sabah
11 Anthony Loke Siew Fook Democratic Action Party (Pakatan Harapan) Seremban  Negeri Sembilan
12 Anuar Tahir National Trust Party (Pakatan Harapan) Temerloh  Pahang
13 Anwar Ibrahim People's Justice Party (Pakatan Harapan) Port Dickson  Negeri Sembilan
14 Arthur Joseph Kurup United Sabah People's Party (Gabungan Bersatu Sabah) Pensiangan  Sabah
15 Awang Husaini Sahari People's Justice Party (Pakatan Harapan) Putatan  Sabah
16 Azis Jamman Sabah Heritage Party Sepanggar  Sabah
17 Azizah Dun Malaysian United Indigenous Party (Pakatan Harapan) Beaufort  Sabah
18 Azman Ismail People's Justice Party (Pakatan Harapan) Kuala Kedah  Kedah
19 Baru Bian People's Justice Party (Pakatan Harapan) Selangau  Sarawak
20 Cha Kee Chin Democratic Action Party (Pakatan Harapan) Rasah  Negeri Sembilan
21 Chan Foong Hin Democratic Action Party (Pakatan Harapan) Kota Kinabalu  Sabah
22 Chan Ming Kai People's Justice Party (Pakatan Harapan) Alor Setar  Kedah
23 Chang Lih Kang People's Justice Party (Pakatan Harapan) Tanjong Malim  Perak
24 Charles Santiago Democratic Action Party (Pakatan Harapan) Klang  Selangor
25 Chong Chieng Jen Democratic Action Party (Pakatan Harapan) Stampin  Sarawak
26 Chow Kon Yeow Democratic Action Party (Pakatan Harapan) Tanjong  Penang
27 Christina Liew Chin Jin People's Justice Party (Pakatan Harapan) Tawau  Sabah
28 Darell Leiking Sabah Heritage Party Penampang  Sabah
29 Dzulkefly Ahmad National Trust Party (Pakatan Harapan) Kuala Selangor  Selangor
30 Eddin Syazlee Shith Malaysian United Indigenous Party (Pakatan Harapan) Kuala Pilah  Negeri Sembilan
31 Edmund Santhara People's Justice Party (Pakatan Harapan) Segamat  Johor
32 Fahmi Fadzil People's Justice Party (Pakatan Harapan) Lembah Pantai  Kuala Lumpur
33 Farid Rafik Malaysian United Indigenous Party (Pakatan Harapan) Tanjung Piai  Johor
34 Fasiah Fakeh Malaysian United Indigenous Party (Pakatan Harapan) Sabak Bernam  Selangor
35 Fong Kui Lun Democratic Action Party (Pakatan Harapan) Bukit Bintang  Kuala Lumpur
36 Fuziah Salleh People's Justice Party (Pakatan Harapan) Kuantan  Pahang
37 Gobind Singh Deo Democratic Action Party (Pakatan Harapan) Puchong  Selangor
38 Hamzah Zainudin Malaysian United Indigenous Party (Pakatan Harapan) Larut  Perak
39 Hannah Yeoh Tseow Suan Democratic Action Party (Pakatan Harapan) Segambut  Kuala Lumpur
40 Hasan Bahrom National Trust Party (Pakatan Harapan) Tampin  Negeri Sembilan
41 Hasanuddin Yunus National Trust Party (Pakatan Harapan) Hulu Langat  Selangor
42 Hassan Abdul Karim People's Justice Party (Pakatan Harapan) Pasir Gudang  Johor
43 Hatta Ramli National Trust Party (Pakatan Harapan) Lumut  Perak
44 Ikmal Hisham Abdul Aziz Malaysian United Indigenous Party (Pakatan Harapan) Tanah Merah  Kelantan
45 Isnaraissah Munirah Majilis Sabah Heritage Party Kota Belud  Sabah
46 Jeffrey Kitingan Homeland Solidarity Party (Gabungan Bersatu Sabah) Keningau  Sabah
47 Johari Abdul People's Justice Party (Pakatan Harapan) Sungai Petani  Kedah
48 Jonathan Yasin People's Justice Party (Pakatan Harapan) Ranau  Sabah
49 Jugah Muyang People's Justice Party (Pakatan Harapan) Lubok Antu  Sarawak
50