This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

International relations This template is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles Politics This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles

In template is missing UK and there idea of Ireland as part of United Kingdom.--Culo-sija (talk) 20:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi, it's under "Ireland/United Ireland" in the last row. --Funandtrvl (talk) 21:01, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

No no, it must be a seperate article. United Kingdom's nationalists always wanted Ireland as a part of UK. This way people may think that UK dosen't have nationalists and pretenders on teritory of other countries (like Falkland Islands and India) and template isn't objective.--Culo-sija (talk) 21:23, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

As pointed at WP:PROJCATS, there are content categories and project categories. The content categories are meant to have articles and only articles, while non-article pages go in project categories.

Category:Irredentism is a content category. Category:Nationalism templates is a project category. A template like this one is not an article, it's a non-article page, and can't be included in the first category. What this page is takes priority over what this page is about. Cambalachero (talk) 03:19, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification there. This may be off-topic, but I have seen numerous templates before being categorised in "content categories". Are they incorrectly categorised thus, and should they be similarly removed? I had applied a similiar logic to this one, hence the revert. Mar4d (talk) 03:24, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes, the other cases must be fixed as well. I fixed many templates I occasionally found in content categories, but don't know of a way to actually search for all of them and complete the work. Cambalachero (talk) 04:18, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

I had deleted Great Timor from the list, as there is not a single Timorese or pro-Timorese source supporting that suppossed "Great Timor". The few and weak sources the article have are from Indonesian sources. Unless proof (not rumours) of that supposed irredentist movement is given, we cannot talk about a "Great Timor" wich it seems to exist only in the minds of Indonesian military and politics...--HCPUNXKID (talk) 16:14, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Someone added Greater Bangladesh to the list, and after removing some added it back (anonymous so no names) with advise that I read the article on irredentism. An edit summary isn't a discussion space, and an edit war isn't a discussion. I reverted with a request to discuss. The WP:BRD cycle is more than complete.

Please, read the article on Greater Bangladesh, which says it's a conspiracy theory, and not irredentism. If you want it in the template you need to change the article first. Please, adhere to policies and guidelines when making those changes. If you want to include it here while the article says otherwise, then you need to achieve a WP:consensus here, on this talk page. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 19:16, 7 August 2018 (UTC)reply

On Guatemala's own wiki page, it states that it is a Central American country. I might be misunderstanding, but in that case, why is it listed under North America and not a separate Central American section? --HappyWithWhatYouHaveToBeHappyWith (talk) 17:08, 29 September 2021 (UTC)reply

The dispute over the ownership of the Rockhall (an unpopulated rock in the North Atlantic) is more about economic rights than irredentism. If Iceland is to be included in this template, then so should the UK as they too claim ownership of Rockhall. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cashew.wheel (talk • contribs) 11:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)reply

This chart seems backwards. This is listing of places wanting to do the so-called annexing but sometimes one target has multiple suiters. i.e. Both Guyana and Suriname are after the Tigri Area area. So too both Venezuela and Guyana are after the Essequibo and then so too Guatemala and Mexico after a half of Belize. Also USA and Canada with Greenland. And India + China + Pakistan for Kashmir -- CaribDigita (talk) 18:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)reply