A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | CH | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
Planned Parenthood v. Danforth | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued March 23, 1976 Decided July 1, 1976 | |
Full case name | Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri, et al. v. John C. Danforth, et al. |
Citations | 428 U.S. 52 (more) 96 S. Ct. 2831; 49 L. Ed. 2d 788; 1976 U.S. LEXIS 13 |
Case history | |
Prior | 392 F. Supp. 1362 (E.D. Mo. 1975); probable jurisdiction noted, 423 U.S. 819 (1975). |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Blackmun, joined by Brennan, Stewart, Marshall, and Powell; Stevens (in all but Parts IV-D and IV-E); and Burger, White, and Rehnquist (in all but Parts IV-C, IV-D, IV-E, and IV-G) |
Concurrence | Stewart, joined by Powell |
Concur/dissent | White, joined by Burger, Rehnquist |
Concur/dissent | Stevens |
Laws applied | |
Missouri House Act 1211 | |
Superseded by | |
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022) |
Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52 (1976), is a United States Supreme Court case on abortion.[1] The plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of a Missouri statute regulating abortion. The Court upheld the right to have an abortion, declaring unconstitutional the statute's requirement of prior written consent from a parent (in the case of a minor) or a spouse (in the case of a married woman).[2]
Background of the case
The District Court's ruling
The plaintiffs brought suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, seeking injunctive relief.[3] Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2281, the court convened a three-judge panel to try the case. The panel consisted of Eighth Circuit Judge William Hedgcock Webster, District Judge Harris Kenneth Wangelin, and Senior District Judge Roy Winfield Harper. The court held that Section 6(1) of the challenged act, which "prescribe the standard of care which a person performing an abortion must exercise for the protection of the fetus" was unconstitutionally overbroad. It upheld the rest of the challenged act. Judge Webster concurred with the panel majority in finding 6(1) overboard and upholding "the constitutional validity of Section 2(2) (defining "viability"), Section 3(2) (requiring the woman's written consent to an abortion), Section 10 (maintenance of records) and Section 11 (retention of records)." He dissented from the majority opinion with respect to four other provisions: 3(3) (spousal consent requirement), 3(4) (parental consent requirement), 7 (termination of parental rights if child is born alive), and 9 (prohibition of saline amniocentesis method of abortion). Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 392 F.Supp. 1362, 1365 (E.D. Missouri 1975).
The Court's opinions
The majority opinion
The court struck down the provisions of the statute that required spousal and parental consent to obtain an abortion. The court upheld the statute's recordkeeping requirement for abortion facilities and physicians that perform abortions.
In addressing the issue of spousal consent, the Court upheld the lower court's decision that just as the state could not regulate or proscribe abortion during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy nor could the state "delegate to a spouse veto power."
See also
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 428
- Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), established the constitutional right to privacy
- Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)
- Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179 (1973)
- Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 492 U.S. 490 (1989)
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)
References
- ^ Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52 (1976).
- ^ Young, Julia L. (1977). "Constitutional Law: Elimination of Spousal and Parental Consent Requirements for Abortion". Washburn Law Journal. 16 (2): 463–464. PMID 11664766. Retrieved April 16, 2014.
- ^ Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 392 F. Supp. 1362 (E.D. Mo. 1975).
Further reading
- Moss, G. W. (1976). "Abortion Statutes after Danforth: An Examination". Journal of Family Law. 15 (3): 537–67. PMID 11663802.
External links
Works related to Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth at Wikisource
- Text of Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52 (1976) is available from: Cornell CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
>Text je dostupný pod licencí Creative Commons Uveďte autora – Zachovejte licenci, případně za dalších podmínek. Podrobnosti naleznete na stránce Podmínky užití.
Planned Parenthood
John C. Danforth
United States Reports
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 428
L. Ed. 2d
U.S. LEXIS
F. Supp.
E.D. Mo.
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 423
United States Reports
Warren E. Burger
William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart
Byron White
Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr.
William Rehnquist
John Paul Stevens
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
Supreme Court of the United States
Constitutionality
Missouri
Abortion
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
William Hedgcock Webster
Harris Kenneth Wangelin
Roy Winfield Harper
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 428
Griswold v. Connecticut
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 381
United States Reports
Roe v. Wade
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 410
United States Reports
Doe v. Bolton
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 410
United States Reports
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 492
United States Reports
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 505
United States Reports
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 428
United States Reports
PMID (identifier)
PMID (identifier)
File:Wikisource-logo.svg
Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 428
United States Reports
Template:US14thAmendment
Template talk:US14thAmendment
Special:EditPage/Template:US14thAmendment
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Citizenship Clause
Slaughter-House Cases
Minor v. Happersett
Elk v. Wilkins
United States v. Wong Kim Ark
Perez v. Brownell
Afroyim v. Rusk
Rogers v. Bellei
Saenz v. Roe
Due Process Clause
Lochner era
Mugler v. Kansas
Allgeyer v. Louisiana
Holden v. Hardy
Lochner v. New York
Muller v. Oregon
Coppage v. Kansas
Buchanan v. Warley
Adams v. Tanner
O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.
West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish
Privacy laws of the United States
Meyer v. Nebraska
Pierce v. Society of Sisters
Griswold v. Connecticut
Roe v. Wade
Doe v. Bolton
Bowers v. Hardwick
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Lawrence v. Texas
Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
Abortion in the United States
United States v. Vuitch
Roe v. Wade
Doe v. Bolton
Bellotti v. Baird (1976)
Colautti v. Franklin
Bellotti v. Baird (1979)
H. L. v. Matheson
City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health
Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services
Hodgson v. Minnesota
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Mazurek v. Armstrong
Stenberg v. Carhart
Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England
Gonzales v. Carhart
Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt
Azar v. Garza
Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc.
June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
Second Enforcement Act of 1871
Monroe v. Pape
O'Connor v. Donaldson
Paul v. Davis
Imbler v. Pachtman
Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York
Owen v. City of Independence
Harlow v. Fitzgerald
Felder v. Casey
Will v. Michigan Department of State Police
Gonzaga University v. Doe
Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community
City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams
Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee
Ashcroft v. Iqbal
Los Angeles County v. Humphries
Connick v. Thompson
Jacobson v. Massachusetts
Zucht v. King
Buck v. Bell
Powell v. Alabama
Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
NAACP v. Alabama
Hoyt v. Florida
Oyler v. Boles
Loving v. Virginia
Epperson v. Arkansas
In re Winship
Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur
Arnett v. Kennedy
Taylor v. Louisiana
Goss v. Lopez
Mathews v. Eldridge
Moore v. City of East Cleveland
Duren v. Missouri
Parham v. J.R.
Parratt v. Taylor
Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.
Kolender v. Lawson
Hudson v. Palmer
Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill
Edwards v. Aguillard
Turner v. Safley
DeShaney v. Winnebago County
Michael H. v. Gerald D.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health
Washington v. Glucksberg
Troxel v. Granville
Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.
Obergefell v. Hodges
Williams v. Pennsylvania
Equal Protection Clause
Pace v. Alabama
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
Plessy v. Ferguson
Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education
Lum v. Rice
Hirabayashi v. United States
Korematsu v. United States
Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma
Shelley v. Kraemer
Perez v. Sharp
Sweatt v. Painter
McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents
Brown v. Board of Education
Briggs v. Elliott
Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County
Gebhart v. Belton
Lucy v. Adams
Browder v. Gayle
Anderson v. Martin
Griffin v. County School Board of Prince Edward County
McLaughlin v. Florida
Reitman v. Mulkey
Loving v. Virginia
Lee v. Washington
Green v. County School Board of New Kent County
Hunter v. Erickson
United States v. Montgomery County Board of Education
Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education
Palmer v. Thompson
Coit v. Green
Guey Heung Lee v. Johnson
Keyes v. School District No. 1, Denver
Norwood v. Harrison
Milliken v. Bradley
Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Palmore v. Sidoti
Hunter v. Underwood
Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education
City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co.
Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell
United States v. Fordice
Missouri v. Jenkins
Gratz v. Bollinger
Grutter v. Bollinger
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1
Fisher v. University of Texas (2013)
Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action
Fisher v. University of Texas (2016)
Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
Breedlove v. Suttles
Goesaert v. Cleary
Reed v. Reed
Moritz v. Commissioner
Geduldig v. Aiello
Stanton v. Stanton
Edwards v. Healy
Craig v. Boren
Orr v. Orr
Parham v. Hughes
Caban v. Mohammed
Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney
Kirchberg v. Feenstra
Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County
Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan
J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B.
United States v. Virginia
United States v. Skrmetti
Bowers v. Hardwick
Romer v. Evans
Obergefell v. Hodges
Patsone v. Pennsylvania
Truax v. Raich
Terrace v. Thompson
Webb v. O'Brien
Takahashi v. Fish and Game Comm'n
Hernandez v. Texas
Graham v. Richardson
Sugarman v. Dougall
Examining Board v. Flores de Otero
Nyquist v. Mauclet
Cabell v. Chavez-Salido
Plyler v. Doe
Bernal v. Fainter
Shapiro v. Thompson
Arlington County Board v. Richards
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Ward
United States v. Cruikshank
Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co.
Breedlove v. Suttles
Skinner v. Oklahoma
Oyama v. California
Oyler v. Boles
Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections
Levy v. Louisiana
Williams v. Rhodes
Oregon v. Mitchell
Boddie v. Connecticut
Eisenstadt v. Baird
San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
Richardson v. Ramirez
Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas
Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia
Zablocki v. Redhail
New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer
City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.
Gregory v. Ashcroft
Vacco v. Quill
Bush v. Gore
Congressional power of enforcement
Civil Rights Cases
Katzenbach v. Morgan
Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer
City of Boerne v. Flores
Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank
Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents
United States v. Morrison
Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett
Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs
Tennessee v. Lane
United States v. Georgia
Shelby County v. Holder
Gold Clause Cases
Trump v. Anderson
Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth
Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth
Main Page
Wikipedia:Contents
Portal:Current events
Special:Random
Wikipedia:About
Wikipedia:Contact us
Special:FundraiserRedirector?utm source=donate&utm medium=sidebar&utm campaign=C13 en.wikipedia.org&uselang=en
Help:Contents
Help:Introduction
Wikipedia:Community portal
Special:RecentChanges
Wikipedia:File upload wizard
Main Page
Special:Search
Help:Introduction
Special:MyContributions
Special:MyTalk
Special:EntityPage/Q7201340#sitelinks-wikipedia
Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth
Talk:Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth
Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth
Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth
Special:WhatLinksHere/Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth
Special:RecentChangesLinked/Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth
Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard
Special:SpecialPages
Special:EntityPage/Q7201340
Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth
Updating...x
Text je dostupný za podmienok Creative
Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 Unported; prípadne za ďalších
podmienok.
Podrobnejšie informácie nájdete na stránke Podmienky
použitia.