Andhadhun has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 15, 2019. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Indian This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force. India: Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 28 December 2018.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

This review is transcluded from Talk:Andhadhun/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Veera Narayana (talk · contribs) 04:59, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello there! Reviewing tonight. Veera Narayana 04:59, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

• There are some places where citations are needed. Look for them.
• The post-production section has got nothing really to talk about post production. It actually acquits itself well in the above two sections of the production.
• Some minors here and there, though not compelling issues for a GA.

Solid work overall. I though it would go for a direct pass, but, there are things that needed to be addressed. Let me know ehen you are done. Veera Narayana 08:26, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Veera Narayana Resolved your above queries. Sorry for the late response. Yashthepunisher (talk) 20:27, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.

   Pass or Fail:

   Veera Narayana 06:33, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Veera Narayana Thanks for the review. Yashthepunisher (talk) 07:41, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Vhhhhjhgy (talk) 07:47, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Now the Remakes table looks pathetic in article. Rahulsoman (talk) 19:57, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Yashthepunisher, Ab207 and DaxServer, your comments are appreciated. I personally don't like putting a remake's "main" cast in these tables since they are irrelevant to the original film, and border on WP:COATRACK. I put "main" within quotes because, unlike American films and TV, who all except the lead actor and actress form part of the "main" cast is subjective (many call the retired actor from Andhadhun and its remakes part of the main cast, I think it was slightly more than a cameo). When I create a section titled "Remakes", I normally put it all in prose, and the only times I mention the remake's cast, it's if the actors from the original reprise their roles or play different roles. Eg: Kalyana Parisu's remakes section. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:19, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Table are efficient to present statistics and objective data but when there's a degree of subjectiveness, prose is the way to go. -- Ab207 (talk) 08:24, 1 November 2021 (UTC)reply

Referencesedit